Showing posts with label book reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label book reviews. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Plantinga's Review of Dawkins
Is there anyone who can write like Alvin PLantinga? I enjoy reading even the stuff of his I don't understand (which is lot...anyhoo). Here's his review of Richard Dawkins' latest book.
Friday, February 23, 2007
Fast Food Nation
Fast Food Nation by Eric Schlosser
The book’s humourously nostalgic cover art belies the scariness of its subject. I finished reading and recalled all the times as a kid I ate at McDonald’s. The nostalgia was somewhat nauseating. . Schlosser’s work has already garnered much attention, with even a motion picture made from it.
Schlosser begins the book with a description of Cheyenne Mountain, one of the most secure military combat operations centers in the world. It houses units of the North American Aerospace Command, the Air Force Space Command, and the U.S. Space Command. This is as well a guarded facility as one is liable to find anywhere. It can sustain itself for a month, with electrical generators, reservoirs of water, medical/dentist office, fitness center, and of course food. And yet, Schlosser describes the absurd juxtaposition of this most secure military site with a lone Domino’s deliveryman driving past signs reading “DEADLY FORCE AUTHORIZED” and heavily armed guards, unloading his arsenal of pizzas and collecting his money. If somehow the U.S. (including Cheyenne Mountain) ever gets wiped out by a nuclear attack, Schlosser writes, “future archeologists may find other clues to the nature of our civilization – Big King wrappers, hardened crusts of Cheesy Bread, Barbeque Wing bones, and the red, white and blue of a Domino’s pizza box.”
This book examines the effects, as well as the causes, of the fast food industry’s being firmly ensconced in American culture. Schlosser writes: “What people eat…has always been determined by a complex interplay of social, economic, and technological forces….A nation’s diet can be more revealing than its art or literature.”
The industry began with a small group of hamburger outlets a only few decades ago in California and has now spread throughout the world.
Fast food can be found everywhere: movie theaters, Wal-Marts, school cafeterias. In 1970, Americans spent $6 billion on fast food. In 2001 they spent over $110 billion. According to Schlosser, “[Americans] spend more on fast food than on movies, books, magazines, newspapers, videos, and recorded music – combined.”
The McDonald’s Corp. is now the source of 90 percent of America’s new jobs. They went from 1000 restaurants in 1968 to around 30,000 today. It is the country’s largest purchaser of beef, pork and potatoes. It owns the most retail property in the world. The biggest portion of the corporation’s profits come not from selling food, but from collecting rent. In a survey of American children, Santa Claus was the only cultural icon more recognized than Ronald McDonald. And the Golden Arches are more familiar than the Christian Cross.
Schlosser writes, “the…success of the fast food industry has encouraged other industries to adopt similar business methods….Almost every facet of American life has now been franchised or chained, [f]rom maternity ward[s] to…funeral homes….a person can now go from the cradle to the grave without spending a nickel at an independently owned business.”
It’s an interesting note of history that the pioneers of the fast food industry, which is so “dedicated to conformity” were iconoclasts, entrepreneurs who went against the grain. Many never attended college.
Schlosser writes, “Fast food has joined Hollywood movies, blue jeans, and pop music as one of America’s most prominent cultural exports. Unlike other commodities, however, fast food isn’t viewed, read, played, or worn. It enters the body and becomes part of the consumer. No other industry offers, both literally and figuratively, so much insight into the nature of mass consumption.”
The most humourous section is chapter 5 where Schlosser describes his visit to a chemical factory that provides the smells and scents for fast food. What you smell as walk through those restaurant doors is the chemical concoction of some scientist in Dayton, New Jersey. The most disturbing part is chapter 9: What’s in the meat. The statistics and stories he shares are chilling and heartbreaking, especially the descriptions of children who were poisoned with E.Coli O157:H7 from eating undercooked hamburgers.
If even a third of what Schlosser has written is true, then there is reason to be concerned. I haven’t eaten fast food in a while, and if I had any inclination to eat some more, this book has stamped it out. Anyone who, upon reading Schlosser’s book, continues to eat fast food would have to be described as either incredibly obtuse or astonishingly brave.
The book’s humourously nostalgic cover art belies the scariness of its subject. I finished reading and recalled all the times as a kid I ate at McDonald’s. The nostalgia was somewhat nauseating. . Schlosser’s work has already garnered much attention, with even a motion picture made from it.
Schlosser begins the book with a description of Cheyenne Mountain, one of the most secure military combat operations centers in the world. It houses units of the North American Aerospace Command, the Air Force Space Command, and the U.S. Space Command. This is as well a guarded facility as one is liable to find anywhere. It can sustain itself for a month, with electrical generators, reservoirs of water, medical/dentist office, fitness center, and of course food. And yet, Schlosser describes the absurd juxtaposition of this most secure military site with a lone Domino’s deliveryman driving past signs reading “DEADLY FORCE AUTHORIZED” and heavily armed guards, unloading his arsenal of pizzas and collecting his money. If somehow the U.S. (including Cheyenne Mountain) ever gets wiped out by a nuclear attack, Schlosser writes, “future archeologists may find other clues to the nature of our civilization – Big King wrappers, hardened crusts of Cheesy Bread, Barbeque Wing bones, and the red, white and blue of a Domino’s pizza box.”
This book examines the effects, as well as the causes, of the fast food industry’s being firmly ensconced in American culture. Schlosser writes: “What people eat…has always been determined by a complex interplay of social, economic, and technological forces….A nation’s diet can be more revealing than its art or literature.”
The industry began with a small group of hamburger outlets a only few decades ago in California and has now spread throughout the world.
Fast food can be found everywhere: movie theaters, Wal-Marts, school cafeterias. In 1970, Americans spent $6 billion on fast food. In 2001 they spent over $110 billion. According to Schlosser, “[Americans] spend more on fast food than on movies, books, magazines, newspapers, videos, and recorded music – combined.”
The McDonald’s Corp. is now the source of 90 percent of America’s new jobs. They went from 1000 restaurants in 1968 to around 30,000 today. It is the country’s largest purchaser of beef, pork and potatoes. It owns the most retail property in the world. The biggest portion of the corporation’s profits come not from selling food, but from collecting rent. In a survey of American children, Santa Claus was the only cultural icon more recognized than Ronald McDonald. And the Golden Arches are more familiar than the Christian Cross.
Schlosser writes, “the…success of the fast food industry has encouraged other industries to adopt similar business methods….Almost every facet of American life has now been franchised or chained, [f]rom maternity ward[s] to…funeral homes….a person can now go from the cradle to the grave without spending a nickel at an independently owned business.”
It’s an interesting note of history that the pioneers of the fast food industry, which is so “dedicated to conformity” were iconoclasts, entrepreneurs who went against the grain. Many never attended college.
Schlosser writes, “Fast food has joined Hollywood movies, blue jeans, and pop music as one of America’s most prominent cultural exports. Unlike other commodities, however, fast food isn’t viewed, read, played, or worn. It enters the body and becomes part of the consumer. No other industry offers, both literally and figuratively, so much insight into the nature of mass consumption.”
The most humourous section is chapter 5 where Schlosser describes his visit to a chemical factory that provides the smells and scents for fast food. What you smell as walk through those restaurant doors is the chemical concoction of some scientist in Dayton, New Jersey. The most disturbing part is chapter 9: What’s in the meat. The statistics and stories he shares are chilling and heartbreaking, especially the descriptions of children who were poisoned with E.Coli O157:H7 from eating undercooked hamburgers.
If even a third of what Schlosser has written is true, then there is reason to be concerned. I haven’t eaten fast food in a while, and if I had any inclination to eat some more, this book has stamped it out. Anyone who, upon reading Schlosser’s book, continues to eat fast food would have to be described as either incredibly obtuse or astonishingly brave.
Monday, April 25, 2005
When Faith is not Enough
When Faith is not Enough by Kelly James Clark(Eerdmans, 1997)
After a fresh snowfall, the world seems a magical place. The brightness of it all is almost mesmerizing (at least it is out here where it doesn’t snow too much). After a couple of days the dirt and car exhaust tinge the white to such an extent that the dovish covering becomes stale and the spell is broken. When the dirt of daily existence darkens the magical landscape of life, faith is the thing that helps us endure the dingy and ugly parts.
I think it’s safe to say that every Christian encounters doubts about his or her faith at some time or another. In one of his essays in Christian Reflections, C.S. Lewis notes that believers, so inured with the material and physical in their everyday experience, are prone to wonder whether Christianity may be just one big delusion. He goes on to note that doubt works in the other direction as well. Often, atheists, in moments of reflective pondering, wonder whether or not there may be more to life than just what they can see and touch and taste.
The fact that there is so much that’s wrong with our world may leave many people to be in a state of continued perplexity over the question of God and his goodness. Clark states the main purpose of his book: "How should we understand faith in the midst of our ambiguous, ambivalent, and suffering world?"
Why is it that the (or at least, a) common response of the church is to blithely gloss over tragedies and simply trot out the common "happy" texts such as Romans 8:28 or Psalm 23? (Your experience in this matter might be different than what mine has been) Maybe all things don’t work out for the good of those who love God (at least not in this life). I’ve never heard Psalm 88 read in a church service; but it may be the one of the most honest of all the psalms. I often feel that people would be better off if they just realize that life sucks.
"Christians, of all people, should be honest about their plight, but they are curiously silent on the topic of honest and sincere doubt. It is, for many, an unspeakable sin."
Clark has written a very readable and thoughtful book on the dilemma of fear and doubt that Christians often face. He goes out of his way to be honest about his own problems and failings. This honesty has a way of drawing the reader into his discussion. In one anecdote he recalls how, as a college student full of intellectual hubris and "feasting my pride", he was humbled by an unpretentious, illiterate, hardworking janitor. As he puts it, "I was humiliated by his humility."
In two chapters, "Moments of Light" and "Moments of Darkness", he contrasts the vast distance between what we perceive to be God’s goodness, and what we experience by way of suffering. All of our good and uplifting experiences, the birth of a child, the beauty and wonder of nature, the exquisite design of the universe, all affirm our belief in a beneficent creator. I read somewhere that Albert Einstein, after hearing pre-teen violin prodigy Yehudi Menhuin play a concert, went backstage and exclaimed, "Now I know that there is a God!" That was before the Holocaust. And the hydrogen bomb.
"I realize, of course, that I may be have been deceived by all my moments of light – that all my glimpses of the divine are just illusion. Part of the terror of life in this age of uncertainty is the realization that all of my most fundamental beliefs might be utterly wrong. My entire life might be structured around a lie."
Could it be that Christians are a little too optimistic about their faith? There are those in the ‘prosperity gospel’ camp who don’t think so. God is the god of blessings. Any bad things that happen are a result of your own lack of faith. If you just have enough faith you’ll be blessed till you can’t take it anymore. Is this the proper view of faith? Clark takes a more realistic approach: "The resolution of doubt and the embracing of faith involve the entire individual, heart as well as mind. Commitment to the person of Christ entails much more than understanding and believing a set of propositions. Genuine faith involves the entire character of a person. Faith is a lifelong process of development that involves the complete transformation of the whole person. Fundamentally, it involves a terrifying and total denial of self."
Faith is a complex thing. Suffering and doubt linger heavily in the hearts of many people. There are no pat answers. Anyone who thinks there are is just fooling himself. The nice thing about this book is that it doesn’t try to provide pat answers. It tries to help the reader to think hard about issues surrounding faith and then tries to point her in the direction of viewing faith as a journey. This journey will contain periods of suffering for which the easy answers are no longer helpful (if they ever were. I’ve heard some pop apologists respond to the problem of evil by saying, "Well, if God were to eliminate all evil in the world, He’d have to eliminate you too, since you’re by nature a sinner." Easy to for them to say). We have struggles but we also have hope. It would be unbearable to live in a world of suffering with no hope.
Clark includes a number of good quotes from various writers, including this one from Flannery O’Connor: "What people don’t realize is how much religion costs. They think faith is a big electric blanket, when of course it is a cross. It is much harder to believe than not to believe. If you feel you can’t believe, you must at least do this: keep an open mind. Keep it open toward faith, keep wanting it, keep asking for it, and leave the rest to God."
In the end Clark views the benefits of faith to be so great that "in spite of life’s darkness, faith ought to be pursued." Strangely, even though the book is titled When Faith is not Enough, he seems to be saying that in the end faith is in fact enough (this is not a complaint, just an observation).
Since I usually don’t know what I’m talking about, you should read the book for yourself.
After a fresh snowfall, the world seems a magical place. The brightness of it all is almost mesmerizing (at least it is out here where it doesn’t snow too much). After a couple of days the dirt and car exhaust tinge the white to such an extent that the dovish covering becomes stale and the spell is broken. When the dirt of daily existence darkens the magical landscape of life, faith is the thing that helps us endure the dingy and ugly parts.
I think it’s safe to say that every Christian encounters doubts about his or her faith at some time or another. In one of his essays in Christian Reflections, C.S. Lewis notes that believers, so inured with the material and physical in their everyday experience, are prone to wonder whether Christianity may be just one big delusion. He goes on to note that doubt works in the other direction as well. Often, atheists, in moments of reflective pondering, wonder whether or not there may be more to life than just what they can see and touch and taste.
The fact that there is so much that’s wrong with our world may leave many people to be in a state of continued perplexity over the question of God and his goodness. Clark states the main purpose of his book: "How should we understand faith in the midst of our ambiguous, ambivalent, and suffering world?"
Why is it that the (or at least, a) common response of the church is to blithely gloss over tragedies and simply trot out the common "happy" texts such as Romans 8:28 or Psalm 23? (Your experience in this matter might be different than what mine has been) Maybe all things don’t work out for the good of those who love God (at least not in this life). I’ve never heard Psalm 88 read in a church service; but it may be the one of the most honest of all the psalms. I often feel that people would be better off if they just realize that life sucks.
"Christians, of all people, should be honest about their plight, but they are curiously silent on the topic of honest and sincere doubt. It is, for many, an unspeakable sin."
Clark has written a very readable and thoughtful book on the dilemma of fear and doubt that Christians often face. He goes out of his way to be honest about his own problems and failings. This honesty has a way of drawing the reader into his discussion. In one anecdote he recalls how, as a college student full of intellectual hubris and "feasting my pride", he was humbled by an unpretentious, illiterate, hardworking janitor. As he puts it, "I was humiliated by his humility."
In two chapters, "Moments of Light" and "Moments of Darkness", he contrasts the vast distance between what we perceive to be God’s goodness, and what we experience by way of suffering. All of our good and uplifting experiences, the birth of a child, the beauty and wonder of nature, the exquisite design of the universe, all affirm our belief in a beneficent creator. I read somewhere that Albert Einstein, after hearing pre-teen violin prodigy Yehudi Menhuin play a concert, went backstage and exclaimed, "Now I know that there is a God!" That was before the Holocaust. And the hydrogen bomb.
"I realize, of course, that I may be have been deceived by all my moments of light – that all my glimpses of the divine are just illusion. Part of the terror of life in this age of uncertainty is the realization that all of my most fundamental beliefs might be utterly wrong. My entire life might be structured around a lie."
Could it be that Christians are a little too optimistic about their faith? There are those in the ‘prosperity gospel’ camp who don’t think so. God is the god of blessings. Any bad things that happen are a result of your own lack of faith. If you just have enough faith you’ll be blessed till you can’t take it anymore. Is this the proper view of faith? Clark takes a more realistic approach: "The resolution of doubt and the embracing of faith involve the entire individual, heart as well as mind. Commitment to the person of Christ entails much more than understanding and believing a set of propositions. Genuine faith involves the entire character of a person. Faith is a lifelong process of development that involves the complete transformation of the whole person. Fundamentally, it involves a terrifying and total denial of self."
Faith is a complex thing. Suffering and doubt linger heavily in the hearts of many people. There are no pat answers. Anyone who thinks there are is just fooling himself. The nice thing about this book is that it doesn’t try to provide pat answers. It tries to help the reader to think hard about issues surrounding faith and then tries to point her in the direction of viewing faith as a journey. This journey will contain periods of suffering for which the easy answers are no longer helpful (if they ever were. I’ve heard some pop apologists respond to the problem of evil by saying, "Well, if God were to eliminate all evil in the world, He’d have to eliminate you too, since you’re by nature a sinner." Easy to for them to say). We have struggles but we also have hope. It would be unbearable to live in a world of suffering with no hope.
Clark includes a number of good quotes from various writers, including this one from Flannery O’Connor: "What people don’t realize is how much religion costs. They think faith is a big electric blanket, when of course it is a cross. It is much harder to believe than not to believe. If you feel you can’t believe, you must at least do this: keep an open mind. Keep it open toward faith, keep wanting it, keep asking for it, and leave the rest to God."
In the end Clark views the benefits of faith to be so great that "in spite of life’s darkness, faith ought to be pursued." Strangely, even though the book is titled When Faith is not Enough, he seems to be saying that in the end faith is in fact enough (this is not a complaint, just an observation).
Since I usually don’t know what I’m talking about, you should read the book for yourself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)